What incident did federal authorities fail to obtain an indictment for a man who threw a sandwich at an officer?

The incident in question relates to the failure of federal authorities to secure an indictment for the individual who threw a sandwich at an officer. The choice of assault is relevant here because assault typically involves the threat or use of force against another person. In this scenario, throwing a sandwich can be interpreted as an attempt to make physical contact with the officer, which falls under the concept of assault, though it may not result in significant harm.

It's important to note that an indictment for assault requires the demonstration of intent to cause harm or the act of causing fear of imminent harm. In this case, federal authorities may have determined that the action of throwing a sandwich did not meet the legal threshold necessary for assault, leading to the lack of indictment.

The other choices—resisting arrest, vandalism, and disorderly conduct—do not directly connect to the physical act of throwing a sandwich at an officer in the same way. Resisting arrest pertains specifically to actions taken to avoid being arrested, while vandalism involves damage to property. Disorderly conduct can cover a range of behaviors that disrupt public peace, but throwing a sandwich towards an officer is more closely associated with an assault charge in this context.