What term did Marco Rubio use to describe the necessity of Hamas for a "better future" for Gaza?

Marco Rubio's statement emphasizing the necessity of Hamas being "eliminated" for a "better future" for Gaza reflects a viewpoint that advocates for the complete removal of Hamas as a governing entity in order to enable progress and stability in the region. This perspective suggests that the presence of Hamas impedes potential development and peace initiatives, and that only by eliminating their influence can Gaza move towards a more prosperous and secure future.

This stance is often rooted in concerns about Hamas's militant activities and alleged human rights violations, positing that their removal would be essential for allowing moderate governance and fostering constructive international relations. The focus on "elimination" indicates a belief in the need for a decisive and substantial shift in control over Gaza, contrasting with other potential strategies that might suggest negotiation or coexistence with Hamas.